Showing posts with label global health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label global health. Show all posts

Monday, October 3, 2011

Guest Blog: A Visit to Grundy, VA

This past weekend, I was privileged to join University of Richmond students in the Global Health, Medical Humanities, and Human Rights Sophomore Scholars in Residence (SSIR) program for a trip to Grundy, VA to volunteer at a free clinic hosted by Remote Area Medical. Dr. Rick Mayes, the program director and my former professor at U of R, asked me to come along.

I took Dr. Mayes’s Public Health Policy class in Cusco, Peru during the summer of 2009. It was then that I started to make a connection between health disparities in underserved, third-world countries and those in my home state, West Virginia. Dr. Mayes encouraged me to challenge the U.S. health system—which I previously thought to be best in the world—and open my eyes to the idea that people at home suffer from many of the same health disparities as those in third-world countries. It was the summer of 2009 that sparked my passion for public health. So, two and a half years later, when Dr. Mayes asked me to join his group of undergrads in a trip that explored health in the Appalachian region, I jumped at the opportunity.

Here's a picture of Dr. Mayes, a classmate, and me walking to an orphanage in the outskirts of Cusco.

We left on Friday morning for our six-hour journey into the foothills of Appalachia. As soon as we arrived in Grundy, several students adamantly volunteered to stay up the entire night to help set up the clinic and hand out blankets and food to the patients who had camped out. The next morning, the students woke up promptly at 4:00 to start their shift at the clinic. (As a side note, I was late to the jump on Saturday morning. I ended up being the last one out of bed!) They worked until around 3:00 in the afternoon, without the nearest inkling of negativity. I truly can’t say enough about these students—it was so refreshing to be around a group of young people who genuinely care about others and have the courage and will to do something about it. These are the people that are changing the world for the better.

On Saturday, the RAM clinic saw around 680 patients, most of whom sought dental or vision care. I took these photos early Sunday morning of the disposal container of teeth extracted during Saturday’s clinic:



On Saturday and Sunday, RAM officials had to stop the flow of dental patients due to the enormous back-log in dentistry (which contained 34 operating dental chairs and took up the entire cafeteria in the elementary school in which the RAM clinic was held).

I worked the majority of Saturday taking basic information from vision patients as they waited in the two-hour line (do you wear eyeglasses, do you need them for reading, distance, or both, etc.). From my interactions with patients, I noticed that many of them had spent months and even years with no or inadequate vision correction. Among those with whom I spoke who did have vision correction, I only saw one person who wore contact lenses.

For me, vision correction and dental care are major facets of my life. With a -8.0 prescription in both eyes (which has continued to get worse every year since I was 8 years old) and signature Armistead teeth (which took around ten years of orthodontic work to correct), I am a clear image of someone who can lead a healthy life if given proper access to quality healthcare.

Of course, I was lucky that my parents had health, vision, and dental insurance, which was certainly a critical determining factor for receiving access to care as a child. Whether they had insurance or not, though, I know my mom and dad would have done everything they could to see that I would grow up to be healthy. Parents who are uninsured are no different. So many parents traveled hours to Grundy to stand outside in 40-degree weather and cold rain, and then to wait inside for another three hours to ensure that their children were seen by the dentist or optometrist. From my observations, parental intent for pediatric preventative care was strong in Grundy.

However, from my observations, I can’t say that the parents and other adults were focused on preventative care for themselves. If I walked down any hallway containing patients in the clinic, I couldn’t smell anything but nicotine, which had worked its way permanently into the patients’ skin, hair, and clothing. The vast majority of patients in the RAM clinic were smokers, and some had even lit up in the boys’ bathroom (of an elementary school…that was hosting a health clinic). Additionally, in the words of one of the RAM volunteers, the clinic “couldn’t give a pap-smear away if it tried.” Although many patients sought medical care, the line for the general medical practitioner was by far the shortest in the clinic. And last, the image above that illustrates the number of teeth extracted in just one day is a reflection of interventative, rather than preventative, focus on health.

The lack of the adults’ focus on preventative care isn’t entirely of their own fault. These are people who lead hard lives, many of them coal miners or disabled laborers. Even if they have health insurance, many people still don’t receive the benefits of dental or vision insurance. They have little access to fresh produce, and are one of the largest target populations for Big Tobacco. In Pampas Grande, we also see a heavy focus on interventative care rather than preventative care. Like the people in the Appalachian region of the United States, a multitude of factors accounts for this, including limited access to healthcare, labor-intensive lifestyles, and lack of knowledge about the benefits of healthcare. Below is a picture of one of the many patients we saw last spring at the Pampas Grande clinic having a tooth extracted:


My experiences working in these clinics have made me question what the condition of my health would be not only if I lived in a third-world village like Pampas Grande, but if I lived in a different part of my own state. There is clearly a tremendous healthcare injustice occurring both abroad and at home, and we have to do something about it. For the sake of human rights, we must fight against the preventable factors that lead to disease and health disparity. -Blair Armistead

Blair Armistead is a member of RGHA and visited Pampas Grande in the springs of 2010 and 2011. She is a recent UR grad and is currently pursuing her Masters in Public Health at VCU.

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

New Perspective from "NEJM": Linking HIV Global Health Efforts to those for Noncommunicable Disease

A recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine (see link below) provides a new perspective on noncommunicable diseases in the field of global health. Such diseases like cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, physical disability, and psychological disorder are ubiquitous and costly, and affect populations and public administrations across the world. There is a clear public health threat presented by noncommunicable diseases, and something must be done to prevent and control them among the world’s population.

The authors suggest that the lessons learned from the multi-national effort to prevent and treat HIV/AIDS (initiated in 2001 during the United Nations General Assembly) could be applied to similar efforts to reduce the prevalence and prevent noncommunicable diseases throughout the world. They cite the increase in HIV surveillance from government organizations, the influx of research findings that supported biologically-based therapeutic and prevention efforts, the rising pressure to deliver programs in a short amount of time, and the large donations and vocal advocacy campaigns that came from powerful activist groups. The authors suggest that a similar approach could be used to approach noncommunicable disease treatment and prevention from a global perspective.

Like HIV, many noncommunicable diseases are rooted in behavioral risk factors. Therefore, like HIV, surveillance systems for these risk factors can be used to measure the problem’s scale, categorize the vulnerable populations, and evaluate interventions. The authors highlight the need to approach noncommunicable disease prevention and treatment from both a behavioral and biomedical standpoint, just as was done in past HIV efforts. They make the point that like HIV, many behavioral interventions for noncommunicable diseases are effective exclusively to people who are motivated to make significant lifestyle changes. “Therefore…,” the authors suggest, “it is critical to welcome and integrate the use of low-cost biomedical interventions into prevention efforts for noncommunicable diseases, viewing them as complementary and part of a holistic approach.”

Considering that the biology of an infection is totally different than that of many chronic, noninfectious diseases, it is interesting to see a possible linkage in the global health efforts for HIV/AIDS and diseases like cancer, diabetes, and physical disability. Indeed, attempting to implement the efforts used and lessons learned from HIV/AIDS global efforts is a daunting task, which would require international (political) support, billions of dollars from governments and private agencies, quick delivery of available resources, competitive environments to produce research supporting effective biolomedical therapies, as well as public awareness and enthusiasm for the problem at hand. Due to its infectivity and mortality, HIV/AIDS came into the world demanding immediate cooperation and use of resources. As a global community, we must recognize the need for similar cooperation and resources to be applied to prevention and treatment efforts for chronic, noncommunicable illness, which is quickly proving to be a serious public health issue throughout the world.

Narayan, K. V., M.D., Ali, M. K., M.B, Ch.B., del Rio, C., M.D., Koplan, J. P.,M.D., & Curran, J., M.D. (2011, September 8). Global Noncommunicable Diseases--Lessons from the HIV-AIDS Experience. The New England Journal of Medicine, 365, 876-878. Retrieved from http://healthpolicyandreform.nejm.org/?p=15249&query=TOC

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Hurricane Irene: A Prompt to Evaluate our Role in the Face of Natural Disasters

Today’s RGHA blog post is inspired by last week’s series of natural disasters in the Richmond area, including last Tuesday’s 5.9 earthquake and last Saturday’s Hurricane Irene. Although the earthquake caused minimal damage, Irene left thousands of people in the Richmond area without adequate water and power supply. According to the Washington Post, Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell predicted that damages to the state would total millions of dollars. Before, during, and after the hurricane, the Virginia Department of health worked (and is still working) tirelessly to minimize the health risks to the public brought on by the disaster, including adequate shelter, food supply, clean water, and ability to communicate with emergency personnel (to name a few).

For all intents and purposes, last week’s natural disasters hit a population that possesses relatively organized public programs for health, safety, and communication. Still, it made a giant impact in thousands of lives and created wide-spread, multi-faceted public health concerns throughout the area. Throughout the world, even in communities with structured public influence— let alone those that are underserved—natural disasters have the ability to create sheer public health chaos.

How can and should we, as practitioners of global public health, work to minimize the risks and damages to populations throughout the world brought on by nature’s wrath? What is our role, in the private sector, to promote and uphold health and safety for communities affected by natural disasters? Certainly these questions present daunting challenges and tremendous tasks for any organization to take on. In fact, private organizations exist solely based on the premise of providing education, prevention, and relief to communities affected by natural disasters (WANDAA, Relief International, Global Education). But what can a general global health organization, like us, do to uphold public health in an effective and efficient way in the face of a natural disaster?

Share your opinion with us. Here are some articles about Hurricane Irene in our neck of the woods and the general effect of natural disasters on public health. Also, feel free to leave comments linking us to more articles that discuss this broad topic.

Washington Post: Obama grants request for federal aid in Virginia for Irene damage

The threat of communicable diseases following natural disasters: a public health response

Protecting the Public's Health

Monday, August 29, 2011

"Wisdom" Brings up Significant Questions about Public Health Ethics

During Elizabeth Pisani’s career working with HIV/AIDS, she has conducted research on HIV/AIDS prevention in diverse communities, served as an advisor for several nations’ Ministries of Health, and provided policy advice to several world renowned public health organizations, including UNAIDS, WHO, the World Bank, and the CDC. Her 2008 book, The Wisdom of Whores, Pisani discusses her experiences dealing with HIV/AIDS in Indonesia, China, East Timor, and the Philippines. In the prologue, she quickly produces a strong assertion:

“Science does not exist in a vacuum. It exists in a world of money and votes, a world of media enquiry and lobbyists, of pharmaceutical manufacturing and environmental activism and religious and political ideologies and all the other complexities of human life.”


Pisani threads this theme throughout the book as she describes and criticizes policies and programs aimed to deal with (or avoid) the HIV/AIDS problem. Pisani frequently reminds readers that epidemics of the human immunodeficiency virus are started through two modes of transmission: sex and needle injection. Often, the people involved in HIV transmission are frequent participants in the sex industry or long-term drug injectors. Pisani claims that governments and non-profit organizations frequently avoid sex and drug injection outreach programs in order to dodge the political and religious conflicts of dealing with the “wicked people” who participate in these behaviors.

Pisani brings up provocative and difficult questions facing the public health realm. To what extent is our work influenced by economical, cultural, and political factors, rather than by evidence based in research? Especially when we are working in other countries, how far can we go to enforce a public health policy that might conflict with certain religious beliefs? Do those that participate in “sinful” or “wicked” behaviors deserve the same right to health and wellness as everyone else?

Pick up the book and share your opinion. These issues are as difficult as they are pertinent to the field of public health and healthcare ethics, especially in the global context. Here’s the link to Pisani’s blog:
http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/
…and you can find her book here (Amazon).

RGHA Medical Projects